Written with AI assistance and may contain mistakes. Verify against the official Transport Canada publications before relying on anything here.

PPL Tester

Applying a CRFI report

A reported CRFI (Canadian Runway Friction Index) corrects two things only:

No take-off correction: see contaminated-takeoff-reject-point. Expected CRFI by surface: crfi-expected-by-surface.

Contamination (water, snow, ice) drops tire-to-runway friction coefficient substantially:

Landing distance, Table 1.3:

Tables 1.3 and 1.4 are guidance, not regulation (TC AIM AIR 1.6.7):

More Table 1.3 rows (no discing/reverse thrust): dry unfactored landing distance vs recommended distance at CRFI 0.60 / 0.30 / 0.18, plus equivalent dry landing field length at 60% and 70% factor.

Dry LDG (ft) CRFI 0.60 CRFI 0.30 CRFI 0.18 LFL @60% LFL @70%
1 800 3 120 3 900 4 620 3 000 2 571
2 200 3 720 4 750 5 700 3 667 3 143
2 400 4 100 5 260 6 300 4 000 3 429
2 600 4 450 5 740 6 870 4 333 3 714
2 800 4 760 6 150 7 360 4 667 4 000
3 000 5 070 6 590 7 920 5 000 4 286
3 200 5 450 7 130 8 600 5 333 4 571
3 400 5 740 7 550 9 130 5 667 4 857
3 600 6 050 7 990 9 680 6 000 5 143
3 800 6 340 8 410 10 220 6 333 5 429
4 000 6 550 8 700 10 580 6 667 5 714

Table 1.3 assumes standard minimum-distance landing from 50 ft:

Landing field length:

Crosswind limit, Figure 1.1:

Trap: CRFI 0.30 is not enough for a 13 kt crosswind; Figure 1.1 recommends at least 0.35.

References


Practice