Written with AI assistance and may contain mistakes. Verify against the official Transport Canada publications before relying on anything here.

PPL Tester

Airworthiness directive compliance

An Airworthiness Directive (AD) makes a maintenance or operation action mandatory, keeping an aeronautical product safe and conforming to its type design (CAR 101.01(1)).

Who it binds (CAR 605.84(1)):

Aircraft must also meet (CAR 605.84(1)):

Requirement Detail Cite
Maintain to any airworthiness limitations applicable to the type design Separate category from ADs (e.g. life-limited parts, certification maintenance requirements, structural inspection documents) CAR 605.84(1)(a)
Meet any foreign notices equivalent to ADs Issued by the foreign type-certificating authority, or the state of manufacture if no type certificate CAR 605.84(1)(c)

Owner's job (TC AIM LRA 5.7.1, Standard 625 Appendix B General Procedures note (i)):

Non-compliance (TC AIM LRA 5.7.1): outstanding AD means flight authority not in effect and aircraft not airworthy, even with a current Certificate of Airworthiness.

Routes around an AD (Minister grants only on a stated safety test, CAR 605.84):

Route Minister must grant if Cite
Exemption Owner shows BOTH: compliance is impractical or unnecessary in the circumstances, AND the exemption gives equivalent safety CAR 605.84(3)
Alternative means Satisfied it maintains the level of safety the AD's compliance time, modification, restriction, replacement, inspection, or procedure was meant to provide CAR 605.84(4)

Trap: impractical compliance alone does not earn an exemption; equivalent safety must also be shown. Likewise an unexpired C of A on board does not make the aircraft airworthy; one overdue AD ends the flight authority the moment the compliance deadline passes.

References


Practice