Written with AI assistance and may contain mistakes. Verify against the official Transport Canada publications before relying on anything here.

PPL Tester

Aerodrome weather-observation station types

CFS labels each aerodrome's weather service by what produces it, not what it reports.

Label Produced by Reports Cite
METAR Qualified human observer Full hourly report (plus SPECI as needed) MET 1.2.3(a)
METAR AUTO AWOS meeting complete METAR AUTO standard (NAV CANADA or DND) Same full report MET 1.2.3(b)
LWIS (Limited Weather Information System) Automated Hourly, only 4 elements: wind, temperature, dew point, altimeter setting. No cloud, no visibility MET 1.2.3(c)
AUTO Automated, below even LWIS standard Variable, non-standard subset of elements MET 1.2.3(d)
VFR weather station - Local VFR use only MET 1.2.4.2
LAWO Airport controllers, from tower cab Visual observation of prevailing tower visibility and tower ceiling MET 1.2.3(i)

Per-label rules:

US vs Canadian terms (MET 1.2.4.1):

US term Canadian equivalent
ASOS METAR AUTO
AWOS LWIS

Representative observation: only if taken within 1.6 NM (3 km) of runway complex centre (MET 7.2).

Location indicator (MET 8.4.4, Table 8.3):

Report type Indicator
Normal Aerodrome's own 4-letter identifier (CY..)
Human-observed, observer not at aerodrome (station beyond 1.6 NM (3 km) from runway complex's geometric centre) Prefix CW instead of CY
NAV CANADA METAR AUTO No difference

Trap: LWIS = defined 4-element hourly report on main network; AUTO = non-standard leftover subset, not on it, so plain "AUTO" is the one to phone the operator about.

References


Practice