Written with AI assistance and may contain mistakes. Verify against the official Transport Canada publications before relying on anything here.

PPL Tester

Chart & publication limitations

Every VFR/IFR chart or publication states what it does NOT cover.

VNC vs VTA:

Item VNC (1:500,000) VTA (1:250,000)
Low ceiling and visibility flight Not for use: scale too coarse Not for use: scale too coarse
Obstacles Not all guaranteed shown Not all shown
Training areas Training and parachute areas: symbol only, no boundaries Flight training area boundaries not shown
Common Frequency Area boundaries - Print only on back of chart
Update interval 1, 2, or 5 years 1 year
Staleness New info reaches NOTAM or AIP Supplement, then CFS, before chart revision Same
Detail Less than VTA: use VTA where it covers your area -
USA coverage Limited (USA, other international): never use for navigation or flight planning there Limited: same

Other products:

Product Limitation Instead / action
CFS Aerodrome sketches too small for hot spots Hot spots: Canadian Airport Charts
CFS No detailed water aerodrome data CWAS
VTPC Not suitable for precise lateral navigation Use applicable VFR chart
VTPC Often shows only highest obstacle per quadrant -
VTPC VFR checkpoints not a primary nav aid or flight-plan point -
CWAS Published once a year, in March Always cross-check a current CFS
CAP Not intended for VFR operations -
LO chart series (IFR enroute, low level) Not suitable for VFR navigation at all: no obstacle, terrain, or road data -

Trap: assuming a more detailed chart omits nothing. Every product, even VTA, states gaps in its limitations section, not its legend.

References


Practice